From: David
Hickmott [DHickmott@uli-atl.com]
Sent: Thursday,
May 01, 2008 12:29 PM
To: David
Hickmott
Cc: David
Hickmott; David Hickmott
Subject: FW:
ILWU Strike May 1st
Dear Valued Unique Customer,
Kindly note the below information regarding May 1 ILWU work
stoppage. This is planned stoppage for only 1 day as reported.
However, there could be some short term impact to movement of freight as even 1
day will cause a “que” effect at the ports, rail, etc….
Thank you for your support of Unique Logistics
International. We appreciate and value your business.
Discover the "Unique" difference of logistics from
Asia to USA trade!
Best
Regards
David
Hickmott - Executive Vice President
ph#404-767-0500
(ext 306)
Mobile#
678-478-6604
Fax#
404-767-3319
![]()
ILWU to Shut Down West
Coast Ports May 1 Demanding End to War in Iraq, Afghanistan
by Internationalist Group ( internationalistgroup [at] msn.com
)
Saturday Mar 1st, 2008 4:13 PM
In a major step for the U.S. labor
movement, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) has announced
that it will shut down West Coast ports on May 1, to demand an immediate end to
the war and occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan and the withdrawal of U.S.
troops from the Middle East. This is the first time in decades that an American
union has decided to undertake industrial action against a U.S. war. The action
announced by the powerful West Coast dock workers union, to stop work to stop
the war, should be taken up by unions and labor organizations throughout the
United States and internationally. And the purpose of such actions should be
not to beg the bourgeois politicians whose hands are covered with blood, having
voted for every war budget for six and a half years, but a show of strength of
the working people who make this country run, and who can shut it down!
In a major step for the U.S.
labor movement, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) has
announced that it will shut down West Coast ports on May 1, to demand an
immediate end to the war and occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan and the
withdrawal of U.S. troops from the Middle East. In a February 22 letter to AFL-CIO
president John Sweeney, ILWU International president Robert McEllrath reported
that at a recent coast-wide union meeting, “One of the resolutions adopted by
caucus delegates called on longshore workers to stop work during the day shift
on May 1, 2008 to express their opposition to the war in Iraq.”
This is the first time in
decades that an American union has decided to undertake industrial action
against a U.S. war.
It is doubly important that this mobilization of labor’s power is to take place
on May Day, the international workers day, which is not honored in the U.S.
Moreover, the resolution voted by the ILWU delegates opposes not only the
hugely unpopular war in Iraq, but also the war and occupation of Afghanistan
(which Democratic candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and Republican
John McCain all want to expand). The motion to shut down the ports also demands
the withdrawal of U.S. troops from the entire region, including the oil
sheikdoms of the strategically important Persian/Arab Gulf.
The
Internationalist Group has fought from the moment U.S. troops invaded
Afghanistan in September 2002 for American unions to strike
against the war.
Despite the fact that millions have marched in the streets of Europe and the
United States against the war in Iraq, the war goes on. Neither of the twin war
parties of U.S. imperialism – Democrats and Republicans – and none of the
capitalist candidates will stop this horrendous slaughter that has already
killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. The only way to stop the Pentagon
killing machine is by mobilizing the power of a greater force – that of the
international working class.
The action announced by the
powerful West Coast dock workers union, to stop work to stop the war, should be
taken up by unions and labor organizations throughout the United States and
internationally.
The ILWU should be commended for courageously taking the first step, and it is up
to working people everywhere to back them up. Wherever support is strong
enough, on May 1 there should be mass walkouts, sick-outs, labor marches,
plant-gate meetings, lunch-time rallies, teach-ins. And the purpose of such
actions should be not to beg the bourgeois politicians whose hands are covered
with blood, having voted for every war budget for six and a half years, but a
show of strength of the working people who make this country run, and who can
shut it down!
Now
is the time for bold class action. Opposition to the war is even greater in the
U.S. working class than in the population as a whole, more than two-thirds of
which wants to stop the war but is stymied by the capitalist political system.
In his letter to Sweeney, the ILWU president asked “if other AFL-CIO affiliates
are planning to participate in similar events.” Labor militants should make
sure the answer to that question is a resounding “yes!”
There
should be no illusions that this will be easy. No doubt the Pacific Maritime
Association (PMA) bosses will try to get the courts to rule the stop-work
action illegal. The ILWU leadership could get cold feet, since this motion was
passed because of overwhelming support from the delegates despite attempts to
stop it or, failing that, to water it down or limit the action. And the U.S.
government could try to ban it on the grounds of “national security,” just as
Bush & Co. slapped a Taft-Hartley injunction on the docks during contract
negotiations in the fall of 2002, saying that any work stoppage was a threat to
the “war effort,” and threatened to occupy the ports with troops!
The
answer to every attempt to sabotage or undercut this first labor action against
this war, and against Washington’s broader “war on terror” which is intended to
terrorize the world into submission must be to redouble efforts to bring out
workers’ power independent of the capitalist parties and politicians. If the
ILWU work stoppage is successful, it will only be a small, but very important,
beginning that must be generalized and deepened. It
will take industrial-strength labor action to defeat the imperialist war abroad
and the bosses’ war on immigrants, oppressed minorities, poor and working
people “at home.”
Workers
strike action against imperialist war isn’t new – it just hasn’t happened here
for a long, long time. During World War I there were huge mass strikes in
Germany against the battlefield carnage, culminating in the downfall of the
kaiser in November 1918. A year earlier in Russia, working-class opposition to
the war led to the overthrow of the tsar and the October Revolution led by
Lenin and Trotsky’s Bolsheviks. The Internationalist Group and League for the
Fourth International call today for transport workers to “hot cargo” (refuse to
handle) war shipments. In the early 1920s, Communist-led French dock workers
did exactly that, boycotting ships carrying war materiel to suppress a colonial
rebellion in the Rif region of Morocco, as they also did during France’s war in
Indochina in the 1950s.
In
the U.S., the ILWU struck in 1948 amid Cold War hysteria and in defiance of the
“slave labor” Taft-Hartley Act to defend its union hiring hall against the
bosses and government screaming about “reds” in the union leadership. In 1953,
at the height of McCarthyite witch-hunting, the ILWU called a four-day general
strike in Hawaii of sugar, pineapple and dock workers over the jailing of seven
union members for being communists. During the Vietnam War, socialist historian
Isaac Deutscher said that he would trade all the peace marches for a single
dock strike. The ILWU was the first U.S. union to oppose the Vietnam war, but
during war and especially during the 1971 strike union leader Harry Bridges
refused to stop the movement of military cargo. (Ship owners made use of this
by falsely labeling cargo as “military” to evade picket lines and undermine the
strike.) This betrayal went hand in hand with a “mechanization and
modernization” contract that slashed union jobs.
As
the U.S.-led imperialist invasion of Iraq was looming, in January 2003 train
drivers in Scotland refused to move a freight train carrying munitions to a
NATO military base. The next month, Italian railroad unionists and antiwar
activists blocked NATO war trains by occupying the rails. In the United States,
ILWU dock workers were a target of “anti-terrorist” government repression, as
police fired supposedly “less than lethal” munitions point blank at an antiwar
protest on the Oakland, California docks, injuring six longshore workers and
arresting 25 people (who eventually won their legal case against the police).
And every year since the war started, the San Francisco/Oakland ILWU Local 10
has voted for motions for labor action against the war. Usually they were voted
down at caucuses and conventions of the ILWU, but not this time.
Last
May, Local 10 longshoremen and Local 34 ships clerks refused to cross picket
lines set up by the Oakland Teachers Association and antiwar activists, defying
arbitrators’ orders by refusing to work ships of the notorious antiunion
outfit, Stevedoring Services of America (see “Oakland Dock Workers Honor
Picket, Shut Down War Cargo Shipper,” The Internationalist No. 26, July 2007). In the aftermath of
that action, the union issued a call for a Labor Conference to Stop the War
that would “plan workplace rallies, labor mobilizations in the streets and
strike action against the war.” The Call to Action stated:
“ILWU
Local 10 has repeatedly warned that the so-called ‘war on terror’ is really a
war on working people and democratic rights. Around the country, hundreds of
unions and labor councils have passed motions condemning the war, but that has
not stopped the war. We need to use labor’s muscle to stop the war by
mobilizing union power in the streets, at the plant gates and on the docks to
force the immediate and total withdrawal of all U. S. troops from Afghanistan
and Iraq.”
As
the conference date approached, the union was the target of several police
attacks, including a vicious cop assault on two black dock workers from San
Francisco working in the port of Sacramento. Some 250 demonstrators from every
ILWU local in Northern California rallied in their defense outside the
courthouse. Their trial to be set march 18 at a hearing will encounter even
larger demonstrations.
The
Internationalist Group and its union supporters helped build and attended the
October 20 conference, along with some 150 labor and socialist activists from
the Bay Area, elsewhere in California and across the country. At the meeting, a
particular focus was resistance to the Transportation Workers Identification
Card (TWIC), which threatens minority workers and the union hiring hall, and
which the Democratic Party in particular has been pushing in order to carry out
a purge of dock workers in the name of the “war on terror.” Not long after that
conference, a federal judge ordered Local 10 elections canceled and replaced by
a Labor Department-run vote, on the eve of 2008 contract bargaining. Federal
agents even invaded the union hall to enforce their order. This action is a
threat to the independence of all unions.
This
set the stage for the recent longshore-warehouse caucus, which voted a motion
for a 24-hour “No Peace, No Work Holiday” against the war. The resolution was
introduced in Local 10 by Jack Heyman, who also presented the motion for the 24
April 1999 coast-wide port shutdown demanding freedom for Mumia Abu-Jamal, the
former Black Panther and renowned radical journalist who has been on
Pennsylvania’s death row for the last quarter century. Although the union tops
maneuvered to prevent Heyman from being elected as a delegate to the Coast
Caucus, the motion passed in Local 10. At the Caucus, the delegate from Local
34 referred to the October Labor Conference to Stop the War as the origin of
the motion.
At
the close of the Caucus on February 8, there was a vigorous debate on the
resolution. The union tops tried to stop it, to no avail. They kept asking,
“are you sure you want to do this action.” The delegates overwhelmingly said
“yes.” Even conservative trade unionists, including veterans of the Vietnam
War, were getting up saying the government is lying to us, we’ve had it with
this war, we’ve got to put a stop to it now. So instead the bureaucrats tried
to gut the motion, which was cut down from 24 hours to 8, and changed into a
“stop-work” meeting (covered by a contract clause) instead of a straight-out
shutdown, thinking that this would lessen opposition from the employers. In the
end there was a voice vote and only three delegates out of 100 voted against.
The
efforts to undercut the motion continue, as is to be expected from a leadership
which, like the rest of the pro-capitalist labor bureaucracy, seeks “labor
peace” with the bosses. In his letter to Sweeney, ILWU International president
tried to present the action as an effort to “express support for the troops by
bringing them home safely,” although the motion voted by the delegates says
nothing of the sort. Playing the “support our troops” game is an effort to
swear loyalty to the broader aims of U.S. imperialism. It aids the warmongers,
when what’s needed is independent working-class action against the system that
produces endless imperialist war. Yet despite the efforts to water it down and
distort it, the May 1 action voted for by the ILWU delegates is a call to use
labor’s muscle to put an end to the war.
For
the West Coast dock workers union to shut down the ports against the war means
a big step forward in the class struggle. The Internationalist Group has
uniquely fought for workers strikes against the war, when all the popular-front
“peace” coalitions dismissed this and even some shamefaced ex-Trotskyists
refused to call for it, saying it had “no resonance” among the workers (see our
October 20007 Special Supplement to The Internationalist, “Why We Fight For Workers Strikes
Against the War [and the Opportunists Don’t]”). With signs, banners and
propaganda we have sought to drive home the central lesson that it is necessary
to defeat the imperialist war abroad and the bosses’ war “at home” by
mobilizing the power of the workers movement independent of and against the
capitalist parties.
That
means fighting the war mobilization down the line. First and foremost, this means
actively joining the struggle for immigrant rights as the government turns
undocumented working people into “the enemy within.” Class-conscious workers
should demand full citizenship rights for all immigrants. Last year, San Francisco Local 10 voted
to stop work and join marches for immigrant rights on May 1, but this was
opposed by the employers PMA and sabotaged at the last minute by the union
tops. Shamefully, Local 13 in Los Angeles, a majority Mexican American port,
made no protest when police attacked immigrant rights protesters that same day.
Today, as the ICE immigration police stage Gestapo-style raids across the
country, organized labor should take the lead in organizing rapid response
networks to come into the streets to block the raids. Despite the campaign by the capitalist
media and politicians to whip up anti-immigrant hysteria, there is widespread
disgust among American working people toward the jackbooted storm troopers who
are terrorizing immigrant communities.
At
the same time, the unions should use the power to put a halt to the attacks on
civil liberties which are part of the home front of the imperialist war.
Driver’s licenses with biometric data, TWIC identification cards with
“background checks,” warrantless spying and phone tapping, setting up special
military tribunals for “trials” in which defendants are denied the right of
habeas corpus, to know the “evidence” or even the charges against them – all
these are part of a drive that is in high gear pushing the United States toward
a full-fledged police state. There have been scores, perhaps hundreds of
resolutions by unions and city, county and state labor bodies against the
U.S.A. PATRIOT Act, showing that labor activists are well aware of the danger.
But just as is the case with the countless union antiwar resolutions, there has
been no labor action. It is commonplace in the labor movement to bemoan the
lack of real action when Reagan broke the 1981 PATCO air traffic controllers’
strike, paving the way for massive union-busting, takeaways and racist attacks
all down the line. Let’s not let the labor bureaucrats bury the vital struggles
of today.
Now is the time to turn words
into deeds, to
speak to the capitalist rulers in the only language they understand. The imperialist
war parties must be defeated by a class mobilization of the working people at
the head of all the oppressed. The ILWU motion to stop work on May Day to put a
stop to the war can provide working people everywhere with the opening to turn
from impotent protest to a struggle for power. For that the key is to build a
class-struggle workers party fighting for a workers government, for socialist
revolution here and around the world, that will put an end once and for all to
the system of endless war, poverty and racism.
Write
to the Internationalist Group, Box 3321, Church Street Station, New York, NY
10008. E-mail: internationalistgroup@msn.com.
Visit us on the Internet at: www.internationalist.org